To ensure you're making the best impression possible during an interview with staff, faculty and administration, please allow Career Center staff to provide you information before hand on:
Standards for the Assessment of Reading and Writing: Standard 4 last edited 9 years, 3 weeks ago content history 4. Assessment must reflect and allow for critical inquiry into curriculum and instruction.
Sound educational practices start with a curriculum that values complex literacy, instructional practices that nurture it, and assessments that fully reflect it. In order for assessment to allow productive inquiry into curriculum and instruction, it must reflect the complexity of that curriculum as well as the instructional practices in schools.
This is particularly important because assessment shapes teaching, learning, and policy. Assessment that reflects an impoverished view of literacy will result in a diminished curriculum and distorted instruction and will not enable productive problem solving or instructional improvement.
Because assessment shapes instruction, the higher the stakes of the assessment, the more important it is that it reflect this full complexity. Critical inquiry into curriculum, instruction, and assessment is important at all levels.
Policymakers, no less than teachers and students, must have clear understandings of the curriculum and instructional practices in order to make informed decisions. Decisions based on severely restricted or distorted information or on unexamined assumptions will be poor decisions. Two major problems beset efforts to inquire into curriculum, instruction, and assessment.
The first is that reading and writing standards guiding curricula in many districts often fragment literacy rather than represent its complexity.
Furthermore, even when the standards come closer to representing these features of complex literacy, high-stakes assessments rarely address the difficult-to-measure standards, opting instead to focus on content that is easier and more expedient to assess using inexpensive test formats.
For example, teachers who emphasize the clarity of writing, attention to audience, vibrant language, revision, and sound support of assertions advocated in many content standards rarely find such qualities fully reflected in high-stakes tests, or they find these standards assessed through items that focus on mechanics or conventions.
Similarly, students who are urged in classroom instruction to form opinions and back them up need to be assessed accordingly, rather than with tests that do not allow for creative or divergent thinking. A second, related problem is the power of assessments to shape instruction see standard 7.
Pressure associated with high-stakes tests as well as some forms of progress monitoring have focused attention on implementing specific curriculum programs, interven-tions, or approaches to instruction. Policymakers and administrators, no less than teachers and students, have a responsibility to understand the complexities and importance of a full and critical literacy and the nature of instruction that will foster it.
They must recognize that tests, although sometimes necessary, are often not the best assessment procedures for capturing the subtleties of teaching and learning. They must recognize test results for what they obscure or fail to assess as well as for what they reveal.
In the public interest, they must not endow test scores with the power to tell more than they are able. Tests that do not adequately reflect a complex model of literacy send a misleading message to teachers and students about the kinds of reading and writing that are valued by society.
In sum, without critical inquiry into the link between specific assessments and curricula, it is difficult to know whether an assessment provides a full representation of literacy or even represents a valid measure of the standards it is intended to represent.
Document and Site Resources.Scribd is the world's largest social reading and publishing site. 4. Assessment must reflect and allow for critical inquiry into curriculum and instruction. Sound educational practices start with a curriculum that values complex literacy, instructional practices that nurture it, and assessments that fully reflect it.
Ford Speak: Acronyms, Definitions, and Terms. This booklet contains the Acronyms and Terms available on-line as part of the Information Management databases on the Ford Intranet. 1. The interests of the student are paramount in assessment.
Assessment experiences at all levels, whether formative or summative, have consequences for students (see standard 7).Assessments may alter their educational opportunities, increase or decrease their motivation to learn, elicit positive or negative feelings about themselves and . P. Assessment monitoring.
"Assessment monitoring" means monitoring conducted to verify water quality and/or to assess the nature and extent of a release of contaminants to ground or surface water. A statement that public comments on the permit-by-rule notification may be provided to the Department within 10 days of the filing of the permit.
1. The interests of the student are paramount in assessment. Assessment experiences at all levels, whether formative or summative, have consequences for students (see standard 7).Assessments may alter their educational opportunities, increase or decrease their motivation to learn, elicit positive or negative feelings about themselves and others, and influence their understanding of what it.