Download this Term Paper in word format. With hubris in his heart, the tragic king attempts to avoid what the oracle forecasts, and only fulfills his fate in terrible circumstances as a result of his hubris.
The lesson of this second myth is the exact obverse of the Oedipus: And today's much-decried "decline of Oedipus" of the paternal symbolic authority is precisely the return of figures which function according to the logic of the "primordial father" from "totalitarian" political leaders to the paternal sexual harasser.
When the "pacifying" symbolic authority is suspended, the only way to avoid the debilitating deadlock of desire, its inherent impossibility, is to locate the cause of its inaccessibility into a despotic figure which stands for the primordial jouisseur: If we effectively killed the father, why is the outcome not the longed-for incestuous union?
Therein resides the dialectic of "You can only prove that you love me by betraying me": This problematique also opens up the vaguaries of ignorance not the subject's, but the big Other's: What the faithful follower should conceal from the paternal figure of the leader is precisely this gap between the leader in the immediacy of his personality and the symbolic place he occupies, a gap on account of which the father qua effective person is utterly impotent and ridiculous King Lear, confronted violently with this betrayal and the ensuing unmasking of his impotence, and deprived of his symbolic title, is reduced to an old, raging, impotent fool.
The heretical legend according to which Christ himself ordered Judas to betray him or at least let him know his wish between the lines It is not enough to have the murdered father return as the agency of symbolic prohibition: Only after this second reversal of the Oedipal matrix do we reach the well-known Pascalean distinction between Jungian archetypes and oedipus the king essay God of Philosophers God qua the universal structure of logos, identified with rational structure of the universe and the God of Theologists the God of love and hatred, the inscrutable "dark God" of capricious "irrational" predestination.
The crucial point is that, in contrast to the primordial father endowed by a knowledge about jouissance, this uncompromising God is that He says "No! This God is the proto-existentialist God whose existence to apply anachronistically Sartre's definition of man does not simply coincide with his essence as with the Medieval God of St.
Aquinasbut precedes it. This, of course, is another way of saying that, through this uttering of the Voice which manifests his Will, God subjectivizes Himself.
The old Egyptian Moses, betrayed and killed by his people, was the all-inclusive One of logos, the rational substantial structure of the universe, the "writing" accessible to those who know how to read the "great book of Nature," not yet the all-exclusive One of subjectivity who imposes his unconditional Will on His creation.
This God of groundless Willing and ferocious "irrational" rage is the God who, by means of his Prohibition, destroys the old sexualized Wisdom, thus opening up the space for the de-sexualized, "abstract" knowledge of modern science.
Pre-modern Aristotelian and Medieval knowledge was not yet "objective," rational, scientific precisely because it lacked this excessive element of God qua the subjectivity of pure "irrational" Willing: A further paradox is that this "irrational" God, as the prohibitory paternal figure, also opens up the space for the entire development of modernity, up to the deconstructionist notion that our sexual identity is a contingent socio-symbolic formation: One can see, now, why, at the level of individual libidinal economy, Lacan calls this prohibiting God the "real father" as the "agent of castration": So when one speaks today of the decline of paternal authority, it is THIS father, the father of the uncompromising "No!
This is what the so-called New Age "holistic" attitude ultimately is about, this renewal of the harmony between Reason and Life substance Earth or macrocosm itself as a living entity at the expense of the prohibitory "real father" 5. The big Other is somewhat the same as God according to Lacan God is not dead today He was dead from the very beginning, except He didn't know it In this sense, the only subject for whom the big Other does exist is the psychotic, the one who attributes to words direct material efficiency.
In short, the "inexistence of the big Other" is strictly correlative to the notion of belief, of symbolic trust, of credence, of taking what other's say "at their word's value.
We all know the old, worn-out joke about a madman who thought he was a grain of corn; after being finally cured and sent home, he immediately returned to the mental institution, explaining to the doctor his panic: You know you're not a grain but a man who cannot be swallowed by a hen!
This story, nonsensical at the level of factual reality where you either are a grain or not, is fully sensible if one replaces "grain" with some feature which determines my symbolic identity. Look at what occurs in our daily dealings with the bureaucratic hierarchy?
For instance, a high-level office complies with my demand and gives me a higher title; however, it takes some time for the decree to be properly executed and reach the lower-level administration which effectively takes care of the benefits from this title higher salary, etc.
We all know the frustration caused by a lower bureaucrat who, casting a glance at the decree, indifferently retorts: Isn't this somewhat like telling you: This mysterious moment can be exemplified by a funny thing which happened during the last election campaign in Slovenia.
A friend of mine was approached for help by an elderly lady from his local constituency. She was convinced that the street number of her house not the standard 13, but 23 was bringing her bad luck the moment her house was assigned this new number due to some administrative reorganization, misfortunes had started to afflict her burglers broke in, a storm tore through the roof, neighbors began to annoy her She kindly asked my friend, a local candidate there, to arrange with the municipal authorities for the number to be changed.
My friend made a simple suggestion to the lady: Why didn't she simply repaint or replace the plate with a different number say, 23A or instead of 23? The old lady answered: The "it" which cannot be duped is, of course, the "big Other" of the symbolic institution.Laius and Jocasta -Archetype of bad parents Tiresias -Archetype of the wise character who leads the protagonist through his journey.
Relations to Oedipus the King Archetypes in Oedipus the King are important because they connect the storyline to other tales (such as Romeo and Juliet).
Jungian Archetypes and Oedipus the King The play Oedipus the King by Sophocles has multiple examples of collective unconscious archetypes from the theories of Carl G.
Myth: Myth, a symbolic narrative, usually of unknown origin and at least partly traditional, that ostensibly relates actual events and that is especially associated with religious belief. It is distinguished from symbolic behaviour (cult, ritual) and symbolic places or objects (temples, icons). Myths are. Why did Freud supplement the Oedipal myth with the mythical narrative of the "primordial father" in Totem and Taboo (T&T)? The lesson of this second myth is the exact obverse of the Oedipus: far from having to deal with the father who, intervening as the Third, prevents direct contact with the incestuous object (thus sustaining the illusion that his annihilation would give us free access to. Oedipus The King Essay Examples. total results. An Analysis of the Central Conflict in Oedipus Rex, a Play by Sophocles. words. 1 page. An Analysis of the Elements of Tragedy in Sophocles' Oedipus the King and Thomas Hardy's The Mayor of Casterbridge. 1, words. 2 pages. A Literary Analysis of Oedipus the King of Riddles in Greek.
In general Jung's theories say that there are archetypes that define the world, its people, and why people participate or commit certain activities. Jungian Archetypes and Oedipus the King Essay Archetypes and Oedipus the King The play Oedipus the King by Sophocles has multiple examples of collective unconscious archetypes from the theories of .
Clarifying and Re-mystifying Transference, Counter-Transference and Co-transference. A Guide to avoiding Procrustean Psychotherapy. Abstract. By developing Jung's Cross Diagram (inspired by an Alchemical woodcut) this paper clarifies the distinct processes of transference, counter-transference and co-transference.
Oedipus King And Oedipus The King - With the city stricken with a plague, a king will try to save it by finding the murder of the previous king.
Why did Freud supplement the Oedipal myth with the mythical narrative of the "primordial father" in Totem and Taboo (T&T)? The lesson of this second myth is the exact obverse of the Oedipus: far from having to deal with the father who, intervening as the Third, prevents direct contact with the incestuous object (thus sustaining the illusion that his annihilation would give us free access to.